[Centora]

Poll: "Change item composition so that all composition points are added to the main item like steed composition."

During item composition if you have composition points allotted to the minor item you lose those points. So if you have, for example, a +3 weapon with 40/240 composition progress points and use this as a minor item you will lose those 40 points giving your major item only 120 points. TQ Digital should change item composition to work like Steed composition.

In Steed composition you keep all composition progress points. So if you had, like our example above, a steed that was +3 40/240 your major steed would receive 160 composition points because it keeps the 40 progression points and didn't discard them.

Note: The steed composition system counts +2 steeds as 30 points whereas item composition counts +2's as 40 points. This would not change with this suggestion implemented in-game. +2 items would still be worth 40 points and +1's would be worth 10.

[johnpriest]

btw .. vote on your own poll lol, but anyhow yeah this is a cool idea totaly reasonable.

[StillHeart]

Originally Posted by johnpriest

btw .. vote on your own poll lol, but anyhow yeah this is a cool idea totaly reasonable.

Why can't he vote on his own poll?

As for composition of items, I have no idea what you mean. Do you want 2 weapons to have butt secks and then have a new weapon come out? I Kid I kid. lol

[chaosknightray]

So like Rollover progress? Yes sure. Definately.

[Centora]

Originally Posted by chaosknightray

So like Rollover progress? Yes sure. Definately.

Yes, exactly.

[Federico R]

I didn't actually knwo you would keep those extra points jijiji. thanks for the info

[DETONATOAREA]

Yes, however i can't quite predict the outcome.
I'd say it would rise the price for + items, but might lower the price for + stones...

[Centora]

Originally Posted by DETONATOAREA

Yes, however i can't quite predict the outcome.
I'd say it would rise the price for + items, but might lower the price for + stones...

TQ Employee ftw??

[DETONATOAREA]

Originally Posted by Centora

TQ Employee ftw??

No, speaking from a marketing view:
Player wins + stone from lotto.
Player wants to sell + stone, but finds out that other ppl can sell + item for more because it gives the extra progress too.
Player goes "FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!"

[chaosknightray]

Originally Posted by DETONATOAREA

No, speaking from a marketing view:
Player wins + stone from lotto.
Player wants to sell + stone, but finds out that other ppl can sell + item for more because it gives the extra progress too.
Player goes "FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!"

.

[johnpriest]

Originally Posted by StillHeart

Why can't he vote on his own poll?

.. i didnt tell him not to, i told him too lol

[Centora]

Originally Posted by DETONATOAREA

No, speaking from a marketing view:
Player wins + stone from lotto.
Player wants to sell + stone, but finds out that other ppl can sell + item for more because it gives the extra progress too.
Player goes "FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!"

I don't think you quite understand this thread. If you had say a +4 120/720 ring and composed it to another ring you would lose those 120 composition points. I am suggesting that when you compose you keep those 120 composition points and they are added to the item. So instead of the current 360 composition points that you would receive from that item you would get 480 composition points.

So essentially speaking from a marketing perspective +1 items may depreciate in value due to players not needing to make the item mentioned above +5 to compose it. This system I am suggesting is the same way steeds are composed. The only exception however is +2 item composition stays at the current 40 point value while +2 steeds only give 30 points. I hope this cleared things up.

[DETONATOAREA]

Originally Posted by Centora

I don't think you quite understand this thread. If you had say a +4 120/720 ring and composed it to another ring you would lose those 120 composition points. I am suggesting that when you compose you keep those 120 composition points and they are added to the item. So instead of the current 360 composition points that you would receive from that item you would get 480 composition points.

So essentially speaking from a marketing perspective +1 items may depreciate in value due to players not needing to make the item mentioned above +5 to compose it. This system I am suggesting is the same way steeds are composed. The only exception however is +2 item composition stays at the current 40 point value while +2 steeds only give 30 points. I hope this cleared things up.

I have nothing against the suggestion. I just stated about the depreciation of +1's value compared to a +1 item with let's say 10 extra progress.
+1 stone gives 10 progress. +1 item with 10 extra prog. gives 20 progress.

+1 stone < +1 item price.

[Centora]

Originally Posted by DETONATOAREA

I have nothing against the suggestion. I just stated about the depreciation of +1's value compared to a +1 item with let's say 10 extra progress.
+1 stone gives 10 progress. +1 item with 10 extra prog. gives 20 progress.

+1 stone < +1 item price.

+1 item gives 10 progression.

[DETONATOAREA]

Originally Posted by Centora

+1 item gives 10 progression.

It gives 10 progression today. But i've meant after your suggestion, if TQ considers implementing it, if someone were to add another +1 (stone or item) to a +1 item, that item would hold 20 progress (since you said it rolls over to what you add it to).