![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia - Perth
Posts: 1,989
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So your removing the ability to put 2nd sockets in your WEAPONS with Dbs, which has been around since near the start of conquer....and your keeping lotto where players can win 2 socket elite weapons.
And im going to assume lotto will still have 2 socket items and +8's? Well I see where this is going, but if 2 soc items and +8's will remain in lotto, then why bother even taking out DB leveling? Same purpose. I mean, while lotto offers the occasional chance for a player who rarely gets cp's the chance to win big, the players who will visit the lotto more frequently will have the biggest advantage because they will get the best gear REALLY fast and really quick....but you are going to hinder their leveling by removing DB leveling. That just doesn't seem to add up for me... [EDIT]: I wouldn't have a problem with keeping lotto, if 3 things are removed: 2 socs, +8s and exemption tokens. (exp balls are obviously already removed.) Keep +1 stones and such to give the db buyers the advantage over regular players and such. At the very least, change +8 to +5/6 and downgrade 2 soc to 1... For the love of conquer, return 2 sockets to their godlike status which was CLASSIC. ![]()
__________________
Liberty ~ViRuS~ Troj 130 - War 130 - Troj 125+ Dreams-Dream We came, we saw, we conquered. Last edited by Aceking; 10-21-2009 at 08:34. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Assassin
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: I has knife
Posts: 3,219
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia - Perth
Posts: 1,989
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
So I couldnt agree more with some things staying that will make them money....but keeping some things in the game that gives a group of particular players an insane advantage over the others....is what I disagree to. I mean, by not allowing players to 2nd socket their weapons with DBs, and only allowing 2 socket weapons through lotto, artisan or from normal 2 socket is a little ridiculous. I mean this is a feature that has been in the game since probably the start, but at the very least....the most early days of the game. Its like just handing them Poseidons Triton and saying here, rule the world. In all honestly, how can you call a game Classic Conquer when you are removing a feature that IS CLASSIC, and is older than the majority of the servers people play on. And then to keep 2 socs and +8's but remove Db leveling. Your jumping ships from one extreme to another with those. Fact is, TQ wont make enough money for it without lotto. Thats fine, but reduce the +8s and 2 sockets to something a little less, but to something that will at least attract attention to and get players to play lotto...as I suggested in my previous post, 1 sockets and +5/6 only. I doubt they will make any changes, but at least consider what i'm saying.
__________________
Liberty ~ViRuS~ Troj 130 - War 130 - Troj 125+ Dreams-Dream We came, we saw, we conquered. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Assassin
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: I has knife
Posts: 3,219
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Back in 1.0, the bulkers were not so overpowered. Yes, they had better gear overall, but it was about skill, not who had the biggest wallet. Today, it's required to buy DBs, back then, it was optional. I miss the fact I could hunt my gear, and build up some nice stuff, without spending money. I did buy DBs, a few even back then, but I didn't feel I had to. Just having lottery in the 'classic' CO is a major turn-off to many, many OLD players. The ones that were here when 1.0 came out, etc. Yet, TQ does NOT listen, as is proven. They want a huge money-making scheme off this, rather than giving their staunch supporters what they want. Instead, they're force-feeding people their money patches, regardless of whatever form they take. Classic CO should be that. NOTHING that came in from 2.0. Cept maybe the warrior 120 shields, they promised those years, before 2.0 >_> |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Registered User
|
Co2.0 graphics.. Does that include the CO2 client? Or will there be the old brown one?
^ Should be choosable, new co2.0 style, or old co1 style |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 148
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
STØRM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Netherlands [NL]
Posts: 5,551
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You can already set the drop rate out of your mind I can tell you that much, TQ still denies to have changed it in the past. that was probably their worst market stunt, changing the drop rates to improve their sales without notifying us and practically lieing about it.
__________________
STØRM Dragon > CO2 alpha > Pyramid > Beauty and Beast > Bluebird. Also proud Ex-Guildleader of DragonSoul, I will never forget the great times we had. Please vote for better guild management |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 40
![]() |
ehh at least they did get rid of bp and socketing gear with dbs. Without bp you can be full +8 and still get your **** tossed by someone with +4s or +5s so its not the huge deal your making it into. My single bulk trojan will still be able to stomp on a mega-bulker if he cant SS/FB worth a ****. Although they should definitly DEFINITLY bring back mining for gems. I mean wtf there is gonna be no SDGs on this server...
__________________
Back unfortunatly Battousai515 130-130-133 Retired nin-war-fire Tomoyo515 130-133-138 nin-war-fire +12 bag, talis, BS, Brace, cap, robe, zebra +7 crop, boots Duke |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
I like :D
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 282
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As far as lotto giving +8's and what not, so be it. But don't have it give out sockets. Thats one thing non db-buyers had vs bulkers. We make a socket, we get handsomely rewarded upon selling it (if of course). As far as +8's, whatever, have fun socketing that. Even if its a weapon, full 1s trojans are gonna rip face as is. Even with super awesome +3's!
As much as I'd like to see lotto removed, its not as effective without the potency, talismans and socketing via dbs. Remember when it first came out? +8's were like "Yeah ok, I think i'll keep my dual thank you.".
__________________
York can suck a giant floppy donkey Diçk, will never be half the man his mother is, and speaks less than rammus |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suomi prkl!!!!!!!! Posts: 8815 + 1609 + 1091 + 113 = 11628
Posts: 14,381
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
I like :D
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 282
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
York can suck a giant floppy donkey Diçk, will never be half the man his mother is, and speaks less than rammus |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | ||
Aimbutter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: England
Posts: 567
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
And yeah i totally agree with what you said, lotto won't be as powerful without potency, tally's etc. and sockets/2 socket non-weapons shouldn't be won via lottery let's face it that's the thing that made the old times so great, non-bulkers made the sockets and bulkers bought them ;D Either way to me would be fine because i'm no good at socketing in tc but if 1s/2s items were removed from lotto that would be great.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 85
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | ||
#1 Fber.
|
Maybe you can't read.. And need your eyes checked.. Because the main poll from eztozia or w/e was never 1.0.. Always a downgraded 2.0.. And guess what? This is a downgraded 2.0 but still all 2.0 not 1.5.. Which is always what the poll was about and what TQ was originally suggested to do.. Classic co forums not 1.0 forums.. You just believed the gossip around forums and never read the thread in which got this originated.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,423
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|