[doggy]

Originally Posted by Mikeyy

he could be out hunting with a archer, wuts it matter if he is or isnt?

and he could also be a bigass botter. wuts it matter if he is or isnt?

Man I dont care if he`d hump the chickens for the money

But dont come here and act all noble like mother ffin theresa and talk like he has some nice agenda to bring peace and flowers and make everybody go out and hunt while holding hands and giving kisses

[doggy]

Originally Posted by Clenk~V.13

Why does he want more chars with higher nobility when he can only play on one at any given time?



Not all kings are the richest on the server. We have a king that isn't even full +12 yet.

Why does he have to hunt on an archer? And it is his only character on the nobility list.

He has no need to bot since he is a king.

haha I didnt know you was his little left pinky

Seriously man go serve that bs some else where

[Clenk~V.13]

Originally Posted by doggy

haha I didnt know you was his little left pinky

Seriously man go serve that bs some else where

Login to mercury and find Chiddy~Bang. He has atleast 3 +8s. while being a king.

Find me how he can play on two chars at once and having being king actually matters on both of them.

Don't know about you, but I hunt on ninjas and monks. Much more fun than an archer.

Just because someone is better than you doesn't mean the bot.


So what part of what I said was BS? Besides the part of which you don't like the truth.

[Seppo]

Love how this is suggested by a TQ employee. But it got over 10 dislikes and more than 50% dislikes, I hope that this will be treated like the rest of the suggestions meaning the "declined suggestion"?

[Infamous~]

Originally Posted by doggy

And if he`s a king he`s the richest ****in guy on the server, winning all the guildwars and tournaments so he gets the most cash to spend on upping his main and second characters nobility...

Dont tell me for one sec that this guy is out in tc hunting chickens on his archer to get his nobility nor that this is his only character on the list.

NOr that he just want us all to hunt a little more. Hes probably a bigass mine``n`mouse botter-.-

Originally Posted by Mikeyy

he is king bro, he bast king of all time

Originally Posted by Clenk~V.13

He is a king. Therefor your argument fails.

1 Infamous
0 doggy

Originally Posted by Clenk~V.13

Why does he want more chars with higher nobility when he can only play on one at any given time?



Not all kings are the richest on the server. We have a king that isn't even full +12 yet.

Why does he have to hunt on an archer? And it is his only character on the nobility list.

He has no need to bot since he is a king.

/alloftheabove

Edit: I can be queen/duke/prince at any time on my server seing as how i am basically the queen on there. I got no problems with this tax.

[Seppo]

Originally Posted by Infamous~

/alloftheabove

Edit: I can be queen/duke/prince at any time on my server seing as how i am basically the queen on there. I got no problems with this tax.

Are you a transvestit?

[Infamous~]

Originally Posted by Seppo

Are you a transvestit?

Why yes i am

On Topic:http://oi52.tinypic.com/2mpzrt5.jpg

[Clenk~V.13]

Originally Posted by Seppo

Love how this is suggested by a TQ employee. But it got over 10 dislikes and more than 50% dislikes, I hope that this will be treated like the rest of the suggestions meaning the "declined suggestion"?

It was made by TQ so we are getting it. This is how Hemp announces upcoming features. Give this a month and it will have dominating approvals like every other poll that community hates.

Originally Posted by Infamous~

Why yes i am

On Topic:http://oi52.tinypic.com/2mpzrt5.jpg

I'd hit that.

[thehempknight]

Actually this is just an idea I had. I just put it here first, so I could decide if I wanted to go ahead and push for it.
It's kinda interesting to see where the line is drawn between the voters.

[Nicknac425]

Originally Posted by thehempknight

Actually this is just an idea I had. I just put it here first, so I could decide if I wanted to go ahead and push for it.
It's kinda interesting to see where the line is drawn between the voters.

as was stated before, this needs to be in the denied section now per suggestion rules set by lotak:

Originally Posted by Lotak

I will close any suggestion with 30 votes or more and 50%+ "no" votes.
I will close any suggestion with 20 votes or more and 60%+ "no" votes.
I will close any suggestion with 10 votes or more and 80%+ "no" votes.

Meets rule # 1, 2, and 3...

Originally Posted by Seppo

Love how this is suggested by a TQ employee. But it got over 10 dislikes and more than 50% dislikes, I hope that this will be treated like the rest of the suggestions meaning the "declined suggestion"?

[AlanAlanAlan!]

Everyone knows this will be implemented, no matter what people vote.

Proof: http://bbs.co.91.com/showthread.php?t=662229

[Infamous~]

such closed minded individuals...Can you even call then individuals? (mind ****)

[Lotak]

I remember seeing a suggestion about "inactivity", where a nobility member (Duke+) who has not logged in for a certain amount of time had their nobility deactivated until they logged back in and reactivated it, possibly with a fee as well.

Unless a person actually wanted to spite people and log in but once a month / 2 months / 3 months etc..., this would be a more cost effective solution.

Fact is, no one likes premium advantages that require additional maintenance just to retain the benefit that they currently hold.

/Denied